Blog

Typography is often treated like furniture.

Pick a font, set margins, call it a day. For many authors that is fine. For a handful of books the page itself becomes part of the story — an active, sometimes malevolent presence that can make readers stop, stare, and feel oddly wrong. Those books teach a useful lesson: typography is not decorative icing. It is a tool you can use to reinforce mood, to disorient, or to open an emotional wedge between text and reader. In this post we’ll explain what makes a compelling font, then shows how certain books weaponize typography so you can borrow the same lessons on purpose and with care.
 
Why typography unsettles us
 
Typography exerts psychological pressure because reading is both cognitive and sensory. Our brains evolved to recognize patterns. When text violates expected patterns — odd spacing, sudden white space, color-coded glyphs, out-of-place columns — the brain flags that violation. That alert is primitive and quick. Designers and experimental authors can exploit that biological reaction to produce emotional effects that words alone might not.
 
Academic work on “disturbing the text” argues that typographic interventions change pace, point of view, and tone in ways that are impossible through prose alone. In short, layout is another instrument in your narrative orchestra. Use it, and the orchestra can play dread. Abuse it, and the music collapses into noise.
 
 
 The Unsettling Art of Typographical Terror
 
While many examples of unsettling typography are simply the result of poor design (which we’ll cover next), the most eye-opening lessons come from works where the unsettling nature is intentional.
 
 
1. The Ring Font and the ITC Benguiat Revival
 
Some fonts have become so culturally tied to horror that their mere appearance can conjure a feeling of dread.
 
ITC Benguiat: This ornate, high-contrast serif font, designed by Ed Benguiat and released in 1977, became associated with the look of many 1970s and 1980s genre paperbacks and pulpy horror titles — inspiring the retro aesthetic of the Stranger Things title sequence. While not consistently used on all classic Stephen King novel covers, its widespread presence on genre books of the era made it feel like the “horror paperback” font to a generation of readers.
 
The Ring”-style fonts: The type used in posters for the Ring film franchise is often portrayed in fan or decorative font sets as a scrawled, distressed design that evokes ghostly handwriting —It’s not just a set of letters; it looks like a cursed message, a warning scrawled by a ghostly, uncoordinated hand.
 
Pro Tips: Be aware of the cultural baggage your chosen font carries, especially for your cover and title page. A font that was once neutral may now be a shorthand for a specific decade or genre of fear. Using a famous “horror” font on your cozy mystery cover will create a jarring, unsettling misalignment of expectation.
 
 
2. The Unsettling Silence of Negative Space in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
 
Jonathan Safran Foer’s Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (2005) uses silence and space to convey deep grief and the absence of communication.
 
The Typographic Nightmare: One section features a series of six pages containing only a single column of short, stark sentences. These are the unsent daybook entries of the main character’s grandfather, communicating his thoughts in the absence of dialogue to his mute partner. The vast, empty white space of the surrounding page—the negative space—conveys the profound, heavy silence and lack of communication between them far more effectively than any descriptive prose could.
 
Tips: Typography is also about the spaces between the letters, words, and lines. This is called leading (line spacing) and kerning (space between letters).
 
Too much space (loose leading) can feel distant, lonely, or frantic.
 
Too little space (tight leading) can feel suffocating, cluttered, or urgent.
 
The strategic use of white space can be profoundly emotive. Sometimes, the most terrifying thing on the page is what isn’t there.
 
 
3. The Case of the Creepy Calligraphy
 
Conversely, trying to inject too much “mood” can backfire, especially in body text. Many authors are tempted to use highly stylized, gothic, or handwritten-style fonts (like a heavy Blackletter or a spiky horror script, such as a fictional font like ‘Necrotic’ or ‘Butcherman’ as one might see on a cover) for in-world documents or whole chapters in a genre novel.
 
While beautiful on a cover, as body text, these fonts often become a literal strain on the eyes. The intricate, distressed, or overly ornate details of the letters force the reader to work to decipher each word. This physical discomfort—the squinting, the slowing down—is a form of low-grade anxiety. The terror here is not the plot; it’s the existential dread of finishing the paragraph.
 
 
 
 The Accidental Horror: Common Typographic Mistakes to Avoid
 
The intentional use of unsettling design is a high-wire act for art and literature. But most typographic terror comes from accidental, amateur mistakes that actively degrade the reading experience. For self-published or hybrid authors, these errors can instantly scream “unprofessional,” which is its own kind of terror.
 
 
1. The Kerning Catastrophe
 
Kerning is the space between two specific characters. Poor kerning is perhaps the most common, subtle, and frustrating error.
 
A classic example of bad kerning can make common letter pairings look like entirely different words, often with hilarious (or embarrassing) results. The letters r and n squeezed together, for instance, can be highly unsettling.
 
When letters crash into each other or fly too far apart, the reader’s eye stutters. They are pulled out of the narrative to consciously decipher the word. This break in immersion is distracting and incredibly frustrating.
 
Tip: Never rely on default word processing kerning for your final interior design, especially for titles and headings. If you are self-publishing, work with a professional interior designer or use high-quality typesetting software.
 
 
2. The “Widows and Orphans” (A Truly Terrifying Concept)
 
In typesetting, “widows” and “orphans” are single lines of text that are tragically separated from the rest of their paragraph.
 
An Orphan is a single line of a paragraph left stranded at the top of a new page or column.
 
A Widow is a single word or a short, stubby line of a paragraph left dangling all alone at the bottom of a page or column.
 
While they sound cute, they are a major pet peeve of professional designers. They create visual awkwardness and interrupt the smooth block of text flow. They scream “amateur layout” to the discerning reader, chipping away at the perceived quality of your work.
 
Tip: Use your typesetting program’s features (or ask your designer) to prevent widows and orphans. A clean, consistent page texture is fundamental to a pleasant reading experience.
 
 
3. The Justification Jolt (Rivers of White)
 
Justification is when text is aligned to both the left and right margins, creating a clean rectangular block. However, if the text isn’t hyphenated correctly, justified text can create huge, inconsistent gaps of white space running through the text block—these are often called “rivers” of white space.
 
These rivers are visually jarring. Your eye is naturally drawn to the white gaps, which disrupts the horizontal reading flow and turns the text block into a chaotic, unsettling visual maze.
 
If you choose to justify your text (standard for most print books), ensure you are using professional-grade hyphenation and spacing controls. Good typesetting adjusts the spacing between words and letters slightly to eliminate these ugly white gaps. Never use the default “justify” button in Microsoft Word for a final print file.
 

 
Making Your Masterpiece Delightful, Not Dreadful
 
As authors, we often hand off the design work and breathe a sigh of relief. But as the examples above show, the typography and layout of your book are not just formatting—they are narrative elements. They are part of the story’s emotional delivery system.
 
 
A Quick Checklist for Authors:
 
1. Embrace the Classics for Body Text
 
For long-form fiction and non-fiction, stick with proven, highly legible serif workhorses. Fonts like Garamond, Caslon, Janson, or Bembo are timeless for a reason. They disappear onto the page and support the narrative flow. Save the exciting, high-concept fonts for the cover or chapter titles.
 
 
2. Master the Unseen Spacing
 
When working with your formatter or designer, ask about the following specs:
 
Leading (Line Height): For print, a line height around 120% to 145% of the font size is often optimal (e.g., for a 10pt font, 13pt or 14pt leading is safe). Don’t let the lines crush each other.
 
Margins: Ensure generous inner margins (“gutter”) so the text doesn’t vanish into the binding. The reader should never have to physically fight the book to read a word.
 
Kerning & Tracking: Ensure your designer checks for obvious kerning issues (like the notorious ‘rn’ looking like an ‘m’). Don’t use a generic word processor’s default settings.
 
 
3. Demand a “Print Proof” Check
 
The single most important thing you can do is order a physical proof copy of your book before mass-publishing. A PDF on a screen is a liar. Only by holding the actual book in your hands—feeling the texture, seeing the text on the paper, and turning the pages—can you truly assess if the typography is serving your story or subtly sabotaging it.
 
If the reading experience is uncomfortable for you, it will be terrifying for your audience.
 

 
The Takeaway
 
Your words are the soul of your book, but your typography is the body. If the body is awkward, strained, or jarringly inappropriate, the soul’s message will not land as intended. Typography is not a footnote in the publishing process; it’s a fundamental part of the emotional contract you make with your reader. Honor that contract, and your readers will happily settle into the warm, inviting sanctuary of your story.
 
 
Now It’s Your Turn!
 
Have you ever picked up a book, only to be immediately put off by a bizarre font choice, strange layout, or dizzying line spacing? Did it ruin the experience?
 
Share your own typographical terror stories with us, let’s know about the worst font fail you’ve ever encountered in a professionally published book?