Blog

Let’s play a word association game

I say “a great reading experience,” you think… “immersive,” “page-turner,” “unputdownable.” But what about “sweaty”? “Anxiety-inducing”? “I-actually-yelled-at-the-book-in-public”? If those descriptors don’t spring to mind, it’s time to expand your writerly toolkit. Because the most powerful, memorable, and transformative reading doesn’t just comfort—it provokes. It doesn’t just entertain—it unsettles.
 
The goal isn’t to torture your reader, but to trust them enough to take them to the edge of the cliff and let them feel the dizzying drop. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to make them a little clumsy in the real world because the fictional one is so all-consuming.
 
 
Why Discomfort is the Secret Sauce of Engagement
 
Research into compelling content consistently highlights a few key pillars: emotional resonance, novelty, and high stakes. A comfortable read might hit one of these. An uncomfortable one? It hits all three like a sledgehammer.
 
When we read something that chafes against our beliefs, pulses with visceral tension, or forces us to gaze into the moral abyss, our brains light up. We’re not just processing words; we’re simulating experience. Neuroscience tells us that reading about an action can activate the same neural pathways as performing it. So, when your character is sweating, panting, or their heart is hammering—your reader’s body might just be having a sympathetic physiological response. That’s your superpower.
 
The magic happens in the liminal space between what is known and what is feared, between safety and the sublime. It’s where true growth—for characters and readers—occurs. As authors, our job isn’t to be tour guides through a pleasant park. It’s to be skilled sherpas on a more treacherous, rewarding mountain path. The view from the top is earned, not given.
 
 
 
Case Studies in Clumsiness: Books That Made Readers Fumble, Sweat, and Shout
 
1. Room — Emma Donoghue (2010)
 
Emma Donoghue writes from a place that feels both lived-in and theatrical. Born in Dublin and now often described as Irish-Canadian, she moves between novels, plays, and screenwriting. Room appeared in 2010 and uses a single, fierce constraint: the story unfolds through the voice of Jack, a five-year-old who has known only one small space as his world. That choice sits squarely in the novel’s genre home of literary fiction with psychological intensity, and it explains why the book landed on prize shortlists and became a film script adapted by Donoghue herself.
 
The feeling when you read Room comes from form as much as plot. The child’s language and narrow horizon force the reader to fill in what Jack cannot name, and that gap produces an odd, physical tension: breath holds, eye-level shifts, a sudden hush in public. The prose asks a reader to live in a small world long enough to notice how ordinary rhythms turn into sources of terror and tenderness. The book never trades on gore; it asks for attention instead, and that attention changes how a person sees a window, a blanket, a voice after the last page.
 
 
2. The Silent Patient — Alex Michaelides (2019)
 
Alex Michaelides is a British Cypriot writer with training that crosses literature and screencraft; his debut novel arrived in 2019 and immediately reached a wide readership. The book sits in the psychological-thriller lane. Its premise centers on a celebrated painter who stops speaking after a violent act and on the professional obsession of the therapist who tries to understand why. Those elements give the book its structure and the author his platform as a mass-market storyteller.
 
The reading experience is less about jump scares and more about the slow, compulsion-driven work readers do after a reveal. People describe the same behavior: a sudden itch to flip back, to re-read lines that once felt plain, to hunt for small signals they missed. In book-club threads and online reviews that habit becomes collective; the book changes how readers treat what came before the turning point. That motion — a return to the text with new suspicion — keeps the book alive after the last page.
 
 
3. The Overstory — Richard Powers (2018)
 
Richard Powers writes as an American novelist with a long interest in science and systems; he published The Overstory in 2018. The book links nine human lives to the lives of particular trees and frames those links across decades and landscapes. Critics and prizes responded; the novel won the 2019 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction and found readers who wanted fiction that treats non-human time as a main character. That combination places the book firmly in contemporary literary fiction with ecological scope.
 
Reading The Overstory feels like being taught a different scale of attention. Sentences slow a reader down, and scenes nudge a person to look up from the page and at the tree outside the window. The novel does not rely on shocks; it works by shifting what counts as central in a story. That shift makes everyday things feel larger and older, and it prompts a quiet restlessness: readers often report new curiosity about forests, activism, and the long arcs that outlast a single human life.
 
 
4. Tender Is the Flesh — Agustina Bazterrica (2017, Spanish)
 
Agustina Bazterrica writes from Argentina and brought this into print in Spanish in 2017; translations carried it to global attention. It feels so different because it sits at the junction of dystopia and literary horror. It imagines a society that answers a catastrophic food crisis with a system that forces readers to confront the language and routines of consumption. The premise frames the moral architecture of the novel without relying on sensational detail to make its point.
 
People say they stop using the same words for food the way they did before, or they find themselves replaying a paragraph to understand how plain prose made something intolerable. That lingering shift in language and habit is what the book hands its readers long after they close the cover.
 
 
How to Craft Your Own “Delightful Discomfort”: A Toolkit for Authors
 
So, how do you harness this power without just being shocking or grim?
 
 
1. Mine Your Own Unease
 
The most potent source of fictional discomfort isn’t a fabricated monster; it’s your own authentic anxiety. This process begins with deep self-interrogation. What conversation topic makes your palms sweat? What social situation fills you with secondhand embarrassment? What moral quandary in the news keeps you up at night, arguing with yourself about the “right” answer? These are not weaknesses to avoid; they are your unique creative fuel. Your genuine emotional reaction—the squirm, the flinch, the frustrated sigh—is the blueprint for a scene that will make readers feel the same way. Authenticity resonates because it’s wired with your specific nervous truth.
 
To implement this, start a dedicated “Unease Journal.” Don’t write stories in it; just record moments. Note the visceral feeling of being cut off in traffic, the chilling politeness of a passive-aggressive email, the profound loneliness in a crowded room, or the gut-twist of having to choose between two bad options. Then, in your fiction, don’t assign that feeling to a character who is “scared.” Instead, reverse-engineer the situation that would cause you to feel that exact way. If bureaucratic indifference makes your blood boil, place your protagonist in a labyrinthine, Kafkaesque system. If you fear the erosion of memory, make that the central threat to your character’s identity. You are not writing about fear; you are building the cage that creates it.
 
Your Exercise: This week, identify one personal discomfort from your journal. Now, write a 500-word scene where your protagonist is trapped in a situation engineered to elicit that exact feeling. Describe their physiological reactions (tight chest, dry mouth), their frantic thoughts, and their desperate actions. Your goal is not to tell the reader “Sam was anxious,” but to make the reader become Sam, sharing in that anxiety. If you feel unsettled writing it, you’re on the right path.
 
2. Betray Sympathy, Not Trust
 
This is the delicate art of making readers love a character and then horrifying them with that character’s choices. First, you must build genuine sympathy. Show their kindness to a stranger, their loyalty to a friend, their internal wounds and hopes. Let the reader see the world through their eyes and root for them. The reader’s trust is not in the character’s inherent goodness, but in your promise that their actions, however shocking, will be psychologically true. This trust is the tightrope you walk. When the moment comes for the character to do the “awful” thing, it must feel like a devastating but inevitable outgrowth of who they are and the pressure they’re under.
 
The betrayal works not when a good person suddenly turns evil, but when a complex person makes a catastrophic choice. Think of Gillian Flynn’s Amy Dunne (Gone Girl). We spend time in her head, understanding her grievances and brilliance. So when her plan unfolds, we are repelled but perversely impressed; the action is consistent with her meticulous, vengeful character. The reader’s gasp of “Oh no, they didn’t…” is followed by the dreadful realization of, “…but of course they did.” Your job is to plant the seeds of this action early—a line of dialogue hinting at a ruthless philosophy, a small, earlier act of cruelty they justify, a core fear that would justify extreme measures.
 
Your Exercise: Take a sympathetic character you’ve written. Outline a moment where they commit a morally questionable act (a lie that destroys someone, a theft, a betrayal). Now, work backwards. Plant three subtle clues in earlier scenes: 1) A Dialogue Seed (e.g., “You have to break a few eggs…”), 2) A Action Seed (e.g., they harshly squash a bug, then calmly explain why), and 3) A Motivation Seed (e.g., their deepest fear is being powerless). The betrayal should feel like a shocking, yet heartbreakingly logical, harvest of what you’ve sown.
 
3. Ambiguity is Your Ally
 
The human brain is a meaning-making machine, and nothing is more powerfully uncomfortable than an unresolved puzzle. While genre stories often demand clear answers, literary discomfort thrives in the grey zone. This means resisting the urge to explain a character’s final choice, definitively state who was “right” in a conflict, or reveal the exact nature of an eerie phenomenon. Ambiguity is not confusion; it is the purposeful creation of a void filled by the reader’s own psyche, fears, and moral compass. The unanswered question lingers, transforming the story from a closed event into an open conversation they have with themselves.
 
Master this by focusing on motivation and outcome. In the final draft, look for sentences that explain why a character did something. Consider cutting that explanation. Instead, show us the action and the conflicting emotions on their face. In your ending, provide clarity on the plot’s events, but leave the emotional or ethical resolution undecided. Did the protagonist make the right sacrifice? Was the antagonist truly wrong? Let the final image be potent but open to interpretation. Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation is a masterclass in this: we know what the biologist did, but her ultimate transformation and the nature of Area X remain gloriously, terrifyingly unclear, making the story haunt the reader long after.
 
Your Exercise: Write the final paragraph of a story twice. In Version A, provide a clear, conclusive resolution that explains character motives and the future. In Version B, resolve the central action but leave the character’s emotional state or the moral consequence ambiguous. Use a final, potent sensory image (a look exchanged, an object left behind, an unanswered phone ringing) instead of explanatory thought. Read both. Feel how Version B continues to vibrate with uncomfortable energy.
 
4. Control the Pacing of Revelation
 
Discomfort is a physical experience, and your prose can directly manipulate the reader’s nervous system. This is the surgical use of form to mirror feeling. Tension is not just what you reveal, but when and how you reveal it. Short, staccato sentences and fragments mimic a rapid heartbeat, shallow breath, and panic. They create a feeling of being hunted, of events spiraling out of control. Conversely, long, flowing, languid sentences can slow time, immersing the reader in a creeping, inescapable dread—the horror of something seen in slow motion.
 
Implement this through conscious sentence craft. In a high-action chase or moment of shock, use the grammar of fear: “He ran. No time. The door. Locked.” The reader’s eye jerks down the page, heart racing. For building unease, use complex sentences that coil and delay the key information: “As the silence in the old house deepened, punctuated only by the inconsistent drip of the faucet from the floor above—a faucet she knew, with a cold certainty, she had turned off tightly—she began to understand that the initial noise had not been the house settling.” Chapter breaks are your ultimate tool. Place them not at the end of an action, but at the millisecond before impact—as the hand touches the shoulder, as the answer is about to be spoken. You forcibly suspend the reader’s breath.
 
Your Exercise: Take a simple line: “She heard a noise in the basement.” First, write it as a moment of sudden panic using only short sentences and fragments (aim for 5 words or less). Next, write it as a moment of slow-building dread using one single, long, meticulously detailed sentence that winds its way to the noise. Notice how the pace of your prose dictates the pace of the reader’s pulse.
 
5. Engage the Senses (Unpleasantly)
 
Our senses are direct pathways to emotion, bypassing intellectual analysis. Comforting sensory details (the smell of baking bread, the feel of sun-warmed stone) create safety. To create discomfort, you must weaponize the senses by focusing on the unpleasant, the intrusive, and the “wrong.” This is not about generic gore; it’s about specific, sensory violation. Don’t just say “the room was disgusting.” Describe the tacky film on the table under your character’s fingers, the sweet-rot smell of forgotten garbage, the high, keening sound of a mosquito trapped near the ear. This makes the experience immediate and inescapable.
 
Think synesthetically—mix senses to create unease. Let a character taste the metallic tang of fear, see the oppressive weight of the humidity, or feel the screaming color of the garish wallpaper. In Tender Is the Flesh, Agustina Bazterrica uses clinical, tactile, and olfactory details to create horror: the focus is on textures, temperatures, and procedures, making the abomination feel disturbingly tangible. Your goal is to curate a sensory landscape that antagonizes your character and, by extension, your reader. What do they hear when they’re trying to focus? What do they smell when they’re hiding? What unpleasant texture are they forced to touch?
 
Your Exercise: Choose a normally pleasant setting (a garden, a bakery, a childhood bedroom). Now, describe it using only unpleasant sensory details for one paragraph. Focus on decay (fungus, fermentation), invasive sounds (drills, buzzing), oppressive textures (slimy, prickly), and spoiled smells (sour, chemical). Do not name an emotion. By the end, the reader should feel deeply unsettled purely through the curated sensory environment you’ve built.
 
  
  
The Delightful Payoff: Why Readers Thank You for the Anxiety
 
This might sound like reader abuse, but it’s the opposite. It’s respect. By making readers uncomfortable, you are Validating their emotional range: You’re saying, “I trust you can handle complex, difficult feelings. Also when you do this, you are creating catharsis: The release after sustained tension is profoundly satisfying. Furthermore, uncomfortable truths sparks conversation and leads to lasting change; it’s no question that books with uncomfortable truths are the most discussed, debated, and remembered. And last but not the least, when you make readers sweat, you make them feel alive. In a world of constant, numbing distraction, a book that can provoke a real, physical, emotional response is a rare and precious gift.